Sorry, what are the criteria for inclusion here? Do things need some "bake time" in extras before they're admitted here?

pretty much every important tool is already in none-ls.nvim. therefore, the rest should more than likely go to extras

also, @jfly @mochaaP, thoughts on requiring an approval from someone else before PR merge?

pretty much every important tool is already in none-ls.nvim. therefore, the rest should more than likely go to extras

How do you know that? And what about the new important tools getting created today (and tomorrow)? I feel like we need some criteria for "this is worthy of promotion to core".

also, @jfly @mochaaP, thoughts on requiring an approval from someone else before PR merge?

If a maintainer sends in a PR, I think it makes sense to wait for an approval from another maintainer.

If a maintainer is reviewing someone else's PR and thinks it's OK, I don't think we need to wait for a second maintainer's opinion.

fixed and thanks @mochaaP

@jfly the criteria for inclusion is i can't recall the last time a tool needed to be added to core. and if it really does need to be, someone will disregard the pr note and submit it here anyway.

Look - it literally happened yesterday. 😭

EDIT: totally agree on "criteria for promotion to core." But, I do think this is separate, and that a default pathway from extras -> core promotion makes more sense than a core->extras demotion.